Even if AI will turn out to be great method for programming, it will replace humans in programming. There will be no place left for human programmers.

Otherwise, and when AI turn out to be a massive hype, it will lead to huge bubble burst which will take lots of tech companies with it. There will be no demand for software for a while, as we did not need much in the first place.

Either way, programming as a career is fucked.

EDIT: Wow, it’s both funny and tragic to see the butthurt reaction. Poor folks who chose programming as a career…

I don’t think this is matter of mathematics, it is difficult to define what “software only running on desired machine” is. Like, do you permit functionally equal software with different code? With painstaking effort, functionality should be approximated fairly close (although idk what that means in mathematical context) On the other hand, requiring exact code is likely not what they want.

Cryptographic guarantee requires mathematical specification, which seems ill-fit in this scenario.

The article seems to be saying that Microsoft is losing favor of investors, not that they began losing money or something.

Don’t get me wrong, I would love Microslop to fall down, but… I do not get how failing to satisfy finicky slop-loving investors is “death to Microsoft”.

Huh, interesting that pop could be realized this time.

I was like, why aren’t you publishing it to a conference/journal if it is good? Then realized that you are doing exactly that. Kudos for the work, looking forward to the progress!

I don’t think Signal trusts the AWS server either, that’s the point of E2EE encryption.

It lists no alternative to actual(-budget) :( I don’t have time to create my own alternative, maybe I should go back to spreadsheets?

Exactly, C++ is what came to my mind when I saw this. Some people don’t put references??

Same. Maybe I… gasp… like trains?

I wonder if we can really trust the TEEs. Isn’t it their hardware where they are quite free to do what they want? Also it looks very vulnerable to the side-channel attacks.

deleted by creator

I feel like they are confounding LLMs AND general AI/ML. The latter is useful in many areas, while the former is mostly hype imo.

That’s such a way to dismiss the theory and academia

You know that is a lie, a lip service for the gullible mass. Samsung just does not care about security and privacy because it does not boost their profits.

Do you mean python has something to do with functional programming, or did I misread? Because I would say e.g. Typescript is (slightly) closer to FP than Python.

deleted by creator

Since they leaked data, here’s more sensitive data to leak for them? Dafuq?

Yeah, the 2nd monitor briefly turns itself off and on in the same moment the 1st monitor tears. I will try to follow the steps.

It only happens in one monitor, another monitor is completely fine - although another monitor flicker when the monitor tears. I will check the monitor with other hardware (e.g. laptops). The connection type is HDMI, sadly the monitor does not seem to have DisplayPort connection.

First of all, thanks a lot! I should try different ones. To try the different ports, I need to open up the case, right? That sounds like work, but maybe that’s unavoidable. Guess I should check if the tearing occurs with laptops first.

Strangely, the tearing seems to happen more frequently in Linux. I am not sure how… Also, turning the monitor off and on briefly fixes the tearing. Does it say anything about it? Plus, it only happens in one monitor, another monitor is completely fine - although another monitor flicker when the monitor tears.