

Is anonymous data collection really that bad? They’ve also been open and explained their whole process. Like surely data collection needs to happen at some level to inform new features and design?
Is anonymous data collection really that bad? They’ve also been open and explained their whole process. Like surely data collection needs to happen at some level to inform new features and design?
No, being able to change size is practical and convenient, there’s a reason people buy them despite the technology being so new
I struggle to use krita and the basic functions are a bit annoying. I find myself having to look up things a lot when I try to use it.
How do you go about enforcing this when the company goes under? (Almost like healthcare shouldn’t be private lol)
This isn’t an unpopular opinion, it doesn’t make it a right one though. For example I have no incentive to upvote this.
I think the most upvoted ones tend to be unpopular ones that are funny in some way, or ones that provoke interesting discussion (regardless of if it’s popular).
When there’s a limit to the size of a commit message it does make it difficult to actually list all the changes, so sometimes this is all you can write.
I know in theory you’re meant to commit little and often, but in practice it doesn’t always work out that way.
Yeah now it repeats the same vocab over and over a bit too long and it’s hard to get much use out of it
I honestly don’t see how the idea of everyone getting an equal share is an extremist idea in the same vein as a racist ideology. I’m also unsure why you’re being downvoted for pointing out the obvious there.
That last sentence sinks it in even more.
I’ve known people who can go through that much in that time
I also do programming and am fairly used to the terminal, and I still have a headache when thinking of going back to linux, because even when I want to do something as simple as watching netflix on firefox I had to go through a maze of troubleshooting via the terminal to get the correct packages installed. I can’t imagine what someone who isn’t tech savvy who tries to switch to linux would do.
The user experience on linux and its distributions just aren’t there for the everyday user, and until they are, windows will always be the preferable choice because it actually works. You don’t have to end up having a dispute with it on some arbitrary software download because it doesn’t quite like it, and have to wrangle through many software alternatives that aren’t always available or even anywhere near feature ready because they aren’t available on the platform.
The thing with your first statement is there’s so many times dealing with software when you are meant to just click ‘yes I’m sure’ that I’ve become desensitised to those warnings.
I think of Google Docs now because the inconvenience of not being able to have word on my own system without a price caused me to use the free alternative.
Suppose it’s magical and not scientific then
I think the tree didn’t give way when it should have and damaged it a bit, hard to tell though