This is weird take on an op-ed. OP didn’t alter the title. The only ways I can conceive of a headline being “misleading” is when it declares a falsity (this doesn’t; it’s an opinion) or doesn’t match the content of the titled text (this doesn’t; it matches the text).

I agree, perhaps I misspoke. It’s weird to call out that his understanding of the situation is wrong when he has no understanding of the situation at all and is uninterested in understanding.

He’s stupid but not that stupid. He doesn’t even care where any drug originated from. He surely slotted “hot-button drug name” into place and blamed Canada because he wants to put pressure on them.

One of the few things in his entire life Donald has learned and been able to apply is the US Republican playbook for blame-throwing.

It is inane that one of the options is “just hold on for a few days and see what happens” and that it is a viable option at all. Government is in shambles.

Is Disney publicly traded? Because you’re not taking into account stock trading in the insane-o market where speculation on possible public opinion can devalue a product by 100% for 2 days. They could be losing possible trade money if that 34% disapproval caused stockholders to short before other people sold and the prices go into freefall.

It all makes sense.

TO’s comment truly is a mélange of victimhood and jingoism that, curiously, is as American as apple pie.

As if a joke more dated than boomer humour is a concerted psyop to discredit French people in “the marketplace of ideas.” Not to mention the myopic view of America in the second half. Baffling.

Anyway, hope the bundle helps those devs hold on and push through some positive change.

I’m confused by this comment. “The original is even better” reads like you are informing TO about the original. But you’d expect them to be aware of it, what with them referencing the joke nickname and saying “a new variation”.

It’s mostly confusing because there are clearer ways of posting the original comic for the uninformed than referencing the only person certain to have seen it.

I find it as funny as the original post

I wouldn’t even really call this recursion. This is closer to a wrapper around the enjoy function to set variables so that “enjoy” doesn’t throw an error.

I may be on the wrong side of history but I can’t see what other role a car could get in the film industry except vehicle.

But what’s even stronger than a gorilla? Two gorillas??

And that’s not even getting into the realities that it was a statement made some 30, 40 years ago(?) and the qualities of “quality” can shift in much less time than that.

The people with millions and billions of dollars aren’t spending all of it before they die. It’s the old people with tens of thousands, maybe hundreds of thousands.

Cheers! Half of the time I understand jokes every time.

This is what happens the other 50%.

Is that an intentional bread pun? I’m not getting the relation.

Sure, the Earth channel has other shows but Humanity has become the main pull of the channel such that it’s pretty much the Earth show. I’ve tried watching some of the other stuff Earth puts out but it hasn’t held my attention like Humanity has, even if the last few seasons have been absolute dogwater.

They’ll unleash such violent violence that women’s voice won’t ever again.

And that’s job creation right there!

Thanks to Discord, I’m able to keep merchants that “connect overbearing authoritarian entities with the data they shouldn’t have, at a price point we all can agree on” at stable, sub-full time employment status.

Truly, pillar of the economy, er community.

Not meaningless but certainly undercuts the grandstanding.

I’m beginning to think companies are doing this to get people to leave by themselves