

You don’t have to be right 100% of the time when scanning for vulnerabilities. You only have to be right once. It’s a fundamentally different game.


You don’t have to be right 100% of the time when scanning for vulnerabilities. You only have to be right once. It’s a fundamentally different game.


It’s a great way to poke at software looking for security holes en masse. Lots of vulnerabilities are ready to be exploited at scale with LLMs.


The internet caused us to forgo our tight communities in exchange for being acquaintances with millions of people.


That’s literally what his cult thinks of him


Yes, that’s a great way to put it


The whole internet of things was a mistake. I say that as one of the biggest tech enthusiasts I know.
Secure software is mathematically possible, but secure engineering is mathematically improbable.


They’re not a Nazi because they disagree. They’re a Nazi because they support a fascist organization that puts people into concentration camps.


That’s a UX issue more than anything, IMO. Matrix is just a protocol


This seems like the better alternative to discord than the other centralized platforms


Gasp! You take that back!



Someone just needs to make a discord clone on Matrix, can’t be that hard, right?


How does it compare to stoat?


Precisely the thing everyone predicted happened? Who could have seen this coming?!


LiDAR lets you see better than humans, so why wouldn’t you use it? What about fog, darkness, or other common roadside conditions?
Ignoring the best sensors means they can never surpass the safety of other self-driving vehicles. It was short sighted (pun intended) to remove that hardware. They have intentionally crippled their vehicles.


That’s Tesla, not Waymo. Tesla’s hardware is shit and does not even include lidar. You can’t judge the entire industry by the worst example.


Unfortunately the word “meme” has come to mean “any image shared over the internet”.


deleted by creator


If you think the Supreme Court needs a specific law to rule on something, you’ve sadly ignored much history of Supreme Court decisions. A large percentage of their work is handwavey opinions based on biased interpretations of obscure and irrelevant documents.
Yes, it’s supposed to work the way you described it, but it hasn’t for some time now.


Exactly, and the Supreme Court could have stopped that in its decision, but it didn’t, because it served the conservative party’s ends.
Yes, but that has to be done at a state level before national level