manxu

Giving the term, “slippery slope” a whole new, semen-inspired meaning!

I am just waiting for the day we find out there is a new Penile Length& Girth Requirement so that Secretary Hegseth finally gets the military he wants and deserves.

Why not both? Implement the testosterone check, kick out all the women for testosterone deficiency?

I have seen so many videos about this exact reader! I think Switch and Click has one, too. Yep, found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKyuLl8A4CY

Silly you: no more wind farms means no more cancer! The Prez said so! /s

I was surprised to find out that he actually stuck with his original issue text and defended it later on. I understand being frustrated and all, but an apology about the tone was definitely in order.

Gib job, pleeze?

It’s weird that high tech CEOs didn’t learn the most valuable lesson from the Metaverse: people are not stupid. If they don’t like something, selling it to them harder is not going to make them like it more. It’s simply not solving their life’s problems.

AI behaves much the same way. It’s not that it’s useless, it’s that faced with the actual cost, its usefulness shrinks to almost nothing. People dislike AI because they know better, not because they are too stupid to see.

I am not sure that rapid weight loss is the healthiest possible thing for someone of Trump’s stats.

But then again, if it works the drug maker gets a big reward, and if it fails then there is nobody there to punish them.

They must not get away with this. Thousands of lives ruined because of algorithms programmed to make you addicted, just so that their owners can make a pretty penny.

Meta is different from IBM in that Zuckerberg made himself god-emperor and cannot be voted out of his position. IBM’s survival took guts and re-invention, Zuckerberg showed that he is a one-trick pony that stole the one trick from the twins.

My money is on Meta ending like Sun Microsystems or Yahoo! Bought for trinkets by some bigger brand, stripped for staff and parts, and then five years later you get an email saying that Facebook is going to be discontinued come January 1st, please join us at Amanvidia.

I went and dug up Italian articles. The backstory is that there was a devastating fire due to human causes, so they came up with the umbrella ban to make access unpalatable and limit human occupation.

No, it’s specifically forbidden, along with portable gazebos.

This is more important that just AI overviews and establishes that companies are responsible for the editorializing they do. That’s much more important in algorithmic suggestions, which drive people into doing things they never would have done otherwise (see: Trump voters).

I hope this stands through all instances and is applied generously, because so many people have been fucked up beyond recognition by following the trail of the algorithm, especially on social and video sites.

I swear I haven’t bought anything Sony since that happened. There are just betrayals that go too far to ever be forgiven.

It starts with “they are giving up the shares voluntarily,” then three months later Mike Johnson introduces the Artificial Intelligence Secure from Terrorism United Patriotic Information Delivery bill (AI-STUPID) that authorizes the emergency purchase of 16 Trillion US Dollars of AI shares on taxpayer dime. 14 go to the AI companies, 2 will water the swamp.

The White House Ballroom is the blueprint, and itself it is the brain child of the Mexican Safety and Security Border Wall.

I sense that all started with the stupid GDPR popups. If so, then sincere apologies from Europe.

It’s very troubling that so many men in America know only one way to express emotions: anger. This kid sounds mostly just heart-broken and lonely, and yet he manages to use healthy emotions, albeit negative, to fuel an increasingly destructive rage.

Expressing sadness and loneliness as anger is bound to make both worse. It’s as if American society had given this kid only one way out of his predicament, and that way out is in fact going to cost lives.

I think the thought process from the site’s perspective is simple: most of the attempts to hack into an account come from devices they have never seen, from places the user has never been. All a passkey does is tie your account to a “logical place,” a device (whether a browser, a phone, or a specific hardware key).

The passkey itself doesn’t tell the server anything it doesn’t know already, it just confirms it, so there really isn’t a whole lot of privacy implication beyond general concerns.

The big problem, and it’s a more universal problem, comes when you are trying to log in from a device that has no passkey. Maybe you forgot your phone, or you bought a new computer, or something else. The “forgot password” flow, and the related “I am on a new device” flow are some of the weakest spots for computer security, because they presume that something happened that automatically lowers security credentials.

What I like about one-time codes like GAuth is that you can transfer the keys from device to device yourself. You are very rarely going to be in a position where you can’t access the keys, and as a result it’s fine to put you through extraordinary measures to reset your security. The issue with passkeys is that it’s pretty common that you’ll be using a new device, and as such you can’t be forced to go through hoops every time you need to register a new one.

Yes, but America’s tourism industry is a pretty big chunk of its economy. Someone didn’t think this through.