justOnePersistentKbinPlease

What? All Google services have always been corrupt data theft systems.

Theyre not removing it.

They are removing the local storage only and privacy settings around it.

Freetube then

Glad you laughed, wasnt entirely serious

Qbasic, if that.

Biden is a blue dog and never cared about infrastructure. Trump cant spell the word. Obama did, but for overpriced drones and oil. Bush only did for oil and deregulated to make things worse. Clinton cut thing Bush Sr cut things. Reagan fucked everything up with “trickle down”

Meaning the last president that did major infrastructure spending is at best Carter, Ford or Nixon.

The term open source is not free to redefine, nor has it been redefined.

He was selling shit gear for many times its worth, thats all. Sorry, never played PoE for long and uncertain about poe2.

The company behind POE can do it easily with IP address.

E.G. one of the bits is that the character was online and playing while he was on a high profile call with some German Nazis (sorry “AFD”)

The main ones are that for the rank of the character, he would absolutely have to know the game damn near perfectly.

In the video he put out, its very obvious he doesn’t know a damn thing about it.
• As in just blindly autoattacking, even when he doesnt have mana to attack • Not knowing how the map nodes work, going into a run with a full inventory • Skipping over all drops including a “Chaos Orb”. Only picks up maps. • Claiming how bad his gear based on the equip level alone when its functionally tue best possible gear you can get • The character’s auction house gear sales are classic RMT scammer money trades, where they put horrible gear up for ridiculous prices as a way to move ingame currency around between mules.

Except they are. You ask about Discworld characters and it gives you direct full quotes from the books.

No, they can only take from things in their models.

Moreover, all of them use statistics, typically Bayesian, to get the results. What you get from an LLM is essentially an average* of the model data. This is why feeding LLM output into a model is so toxic, it’s already the average.

• Yes I know it’s not really the average, but for laymen us good enough comparison.

It can reproduce an api. Can’t solve actual problems. LLMs are completely incapable of innovation.

Proof. I am asking for anything for you to back up what you are claiming.

All of those things require context. Something LLMs cannot ever understand; it is a hard limit of the statistical analysis that LLMs use.

Edit: also, here is proof of cognitive decline brought about as a result of feeding LLM outputs back into LLM models: https://bmjgroup.com/almost-all-leading-ai-chatbots-show-signs-of-cognitive-decline/

Show me documentation of any of this actually happening and being effective. @

E.G. Dell has had automated logistics for more than 20 years. LLMs would make it less efficient, since they aren’t anywhere near as fast or efficient as regular programs. And they hallucinate. Ditto Ikea and a few others for that matter. E.G.2. LLMs cannot and will not “fine tune” robotic movements. The movement of a robotic arm is either hand-programmed, or done with a mathematical process called Inverse Kinematics to move them between two points. They are already fine tuned.

You don’t need vision systems in a warehouse. That’s what QR and barcode scanners are for.

I am amused that of all innovations available, you are going 250 years back to a very basic machine. Next you’ll be comparing LLMs to the concept of sand casting copper ax blade being better than knapping a rock into a hamd ax.

Not something like how Email, SMS and Instant messaging have almost completely replaced fax and telephone calls.

Sorry, but warehouse pickers and packers are not, and will never be at risk from LLMs.

Because they’re already obsolete from standard 30 year old robotics.

Also anything requiring precision, suited and accuracy isnt ever going to be viable for LLMs to replace. The technology isn’t designed for that and is not capable of meeting a human. E.G. for general automaton: US automotive giants Ford and GM tried to go fully automated for production in the 1980s and 1990s, but reverted some of the automation when it turned out that their senior machinists were better and faster than the robots, saving the companies more than a million dollars per person per year.

Foldables solve two problems, one consumer and one business.

1. Consumer problem: phones are unweildly and large. Folding allows optimal screen space in addition to a return to portability.

2. Business Problem: how to make people upgrade their phone every year when we can make phones that last 5-10 years+ easily? Make a folding phone that will absolutely break within a year or two tops. It is not a negative pattern like pre-1980s spark plugs or modern LED light bulbs that should never burn out but do; so governments have no reason or legal avenue to pursue.

If he was Arab

Fixed that for you. This is in the extremely oppressive Dubai/UAE where any kind of extramarital thing is very much illegal.

Same here. But you can reliably fill a raid at its launch by yourself with no one else around.

Its more amusing than you think. Most really hardcore of the players left now spoof their GPS position.

Id be willing to bet that most of the navigation data is completely useless.

So the problem is that AI based search engines dont give credit to their source sites because they do not link to the source site, but instead steal the content in a legally untested method and serve that up.

Nothing to do with links going extinct.