Its been heavily traded and guardrailed to not make judgements.

While Reagan is the instrument that set America the path to hell, Bill Clinton was the right hand who crushed any idea of a rebound by labor. One can only assume both Clintons were critical in selling the DNC to capital.

No, GDPR applies to all data, not just PII.

Unless you are in the EU Reddit absolutely did not delete your data.

You didn’t even write your own kernel, sad!

How recently did you try this?

Yes exactly, it’s all part of the MCU (movie cinematic universe)

Sure, then fix it to one character.

Just because you have citizenship means you can leave nor that the west bank isn’t your home. People don’t just casually move their families.

They don’t exist?

Just build trains…

What are you using that makes it crash, virtually never happens to me.

That’s a pretty good analogy, but it’s Fortran and B-52. Fortran is very good at what it does to this day. Cobol was never good.

Cars that have never had a style update. Now that they exist in meaningful numbers they look old and tired.

If getting people back into work makes your property more valuable that the productive losses, it’s not a sunk cost. The leaders might be doing their math wrong, but they are not necessarily making a sunk cost fallacy here.

However, i do agree it’s likely a choice driven by power and personalities, not money. I suspect a lot of talk about how remote workers can be abused and controlled has happened.

They don’t have leases. They own that real estate. So its value is a considerable line item in the company’s value. If they get people in office, it’s a boost to the company’s value. The property is hit yet sunk in their eyes.

No, it does not. It means that they think it’s more profitable for shareholders.

Internet should be a public utility and owned by the local government.

The core issue here is we don’t know how to measure the skill of learning directly.

Bc companies aren’t people. Corporations and humans are in no way two equal entities. There is no reason to think the laws should be set in any way other than ensuring people have their needs met.