I just started using duckduckgo because it’s default in librefox, which I also just started using.

Feels different, I’m going to spend the effort getting used to it.

You didn’t just punch him in the mouth?

Her degrees are ECE and conservation so no.

So on one hand, yes. On the other hand, there are tasks that are onerous to non technicians.

If you asked me to do it manually, sure. I’ve interacted with a bunch of software, understand measurement systems, done some programming etc.

My wife on the other hand… There’s no overlap between ecology or life sciences in this task. Outside her ability.

Maybe support agent was being lazy, or ignorant.

The portal the agents use should be able to bring up internal info via keywords like “colour registration”

Just chasing pickle again and again

If it doesn’t have real revenue, it can’t pay for it’s carbon footprint and will/should be regulated.

If there’s no known way to prevent these models from regurgitating copywrited works if they are trained on those works, how will it not be regulated that way?

Like I said, the way it’s driven now. It could be done differently.

They are losing money on their 200$ subscriber plan afaik. These “goalposts” are all saying the same thing.

It is a dead end because of the way it’s being driven.

You brought up 100 billion by 2030. There’s no revenue, and it’s not useful to people. Saying there’s some speculated value but not showing that there’s real services or a real product makes this a speculative investment vehicle, not science or technology.

Small research projects and niche production use cases aren’t 100b. You aren’t disproving it’s hypetrain with such small real examples.

Right, and what percentage of their expenditures is software tooling?

Who’s paying for this shit? Anybody? Who’s selling it without a loss? Anybody?

Is the market cap on speculative chemical analysis that many billions?

What’s the billable market cap on which services exactly?

How will there be enough revenue to justify a 60 billion evaluation?

Heh there might be some correlation along the lines of

Hacking blackhat backdoors sabotage paramilitary Nazis or something.

quieter, and uses way less power.

VERY IMPORTANT PAY ATTENTION TO THIS SENTENCE OP

can adapt in the moment if you supply it with the right context

So the disabled have to jump through hoops to interact with the world, great. And can be, meaning somebody has to review what’s being put into this black box instead of just having a person do the task themselves. Instead of a person being qualified for the task, some corp is getting rent from everybody.

Basically you are taking away customer service and providing a booking bot. No thanks.

If we have a people communication method, let them talk to people. If it’s a computer interface, apeing humans is a waste and less accessible than a web form.

How is someone that speaks a different language supposed to translate that voice bot? Wouldn’t it be more simple to translate text on a screen?

What’s the value add pretending?

The AI can’t adapt in the moment. A hotel is not a technology company that can train a model. It won’t be bespoke, so it won’t be following current, local laws.

How is it suited to AI?

Would you rather pay for a limited, energy inefficient and less accessible thing or a real human that can adapt and gain skills, be mentored?

I don’t know why there’s a question here

But what if my human is late or my customers are disabled?

If you spent time giving your employees instructions, you did half the design work for a web form.

There’s videos of real humans talking about this movie

https://www.youtube.com/live/SNDa1it7hsU

Just make a fucking web form for booking

never taken for granted

In healthy relationships anyway