Why would it?
It doesn’t matter where its hosted
Time to do steganography to talk to my friends I guess
Sadly it seems like most of Europe and potentially other “western” countries will follow
The EU is trying to do this at an EU level (and has been for years). As well as an individual country level, Sweden seems likely to pass a similar law in 2026.
https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/26/signal_will_withdraw_from_sweden/
https://www.wired.com/story/europe-break-encryption-leaked-document-csa-law/
Yep lol
IIRC there was actually a study and pedos with access to synthetic CSAM were less likely to victimize real children.
equatable
But they aren’t equivalent. You’re now saying they’re equivalent.
Now I know you’re trolling.
I’m not.
But that’s better than someone who genuinely does think child rape is fine, so that’s good.
I agree, good thing I don’t think that.
You just said I compared not equated…
I analogized, but I’m glad you finally admit I didn’t equate them. Because, shockingly, comparing is not equating. Literally any 2 things can be compared, that isn’t equating.
I didn’t, quote where I did, you’re trolling for no reason to just not admit to being wrong
I didn’t and you know I didn’t that’s why you’re not quoting it
No you didn’t because I didn’t, quote it
If I equated them it should easy to quote where I did, that’s the last I’ll say on the matter until you quote it.
Do you believe he suddenly changed his mind on an opinion he held and shouted to the world, 2 days after it became apparent he might lose his job over it?
Why didn’t he reverse then? He’s never seemed shy about sharing his opinions before.
If someone committed fraud, then went to court and said “your honour, I actually agree with you. Fraud is wrong. I came to that conclusion this morning.” would you believe them?
An opinion however gross isn’t a crime.
It’s what all of your comments have been about. Don’t play dumb.
I never said it, that’s why you can’t quote it
Quote it then
No, he thinks raping children is a good thing.
Again, he never said that.
Saying “thought” implies he no longer does.
He claims he no longer does, can you read his mind?
Yes you are.
Quote what exactly I said that was either of those things.
That’s not nice