

So yes, 100℅ they are.


So yes, 100℅ they are.


Buying a Pixel isn’t automatically supporting Google. You can get them secondhand.


Yeah, I dont love that about TubeArchivist.


What the fuck dude


FYI, I think your third mention of Graphene was meant to be /e/OS.


I think they’re running it on their PSP or something 😂


Don’t threaten, do you wussies.


I think history has shown us again and again that it WILL enshitify in the future. The nail is already in the coffin, its just a matter of time until its buried.


I think one could have reasonably assumed I meant to type rogue. Fat thumbs and all that.


That’s not a sentence. What are you asking?


That’s fair. I’ve been meaning to set up patreon donations to the handful of creators I still watch. Thanks for reminding me.


Then say a black bear. It presumes nothing.


Download a YouTube frontend.


Use a YouTube frontend. Don’t give them any ad revenue. Make it cost them money to service you.


They didn’t say bots are pointless, they said bots aren’t people.


Who is downloading and selfhosting a million+ YouTube videos tho? Wild.


How’s the playback/library organization for TubeSync? That’s my primary interest with TubeArchivist.


I took a look at pinchflat but it seemed more focussed on the archival side of things rather than the playback side. Would you say thats accurate? Because honestly all I’m looking for is a frontend to easily watch my videos. I only download an odd video here and there and for that purpose yt-dlp works perfectly fine.


Okay, your notes have definitely helped a bit. I compared your compose file against mine and removed the HOST_UID, HOST_GID, and the healthcheck sections from the default file. Its still taking an abnormal amount of time to boot up and login, but the container isn’t completely throttling my system anymore. I suspect the healthcheck was the culprit. A step in the right direction though, thank you!
Are these people fucking stupid? AI can’t remove something hardcoded to the image. The only way for it to “remove” it is by placing a different image over it, but since it has no idea what’s underneath, it would literally just be making up a new image that has nothing to do with the content of the original. Jfc, people are morons. I’m disappointed the article doesn’t explicitly state that either.