What about the lies you say? What about that article with Russian propaganda you said was a good example and directly applicable? Answer child.
Wasn’t talking about Gaza then. They also didn’t say anything because well, they were articles on Ukraine. Learn to follow the conversation before you speak child.
“It appears no matter how many facts you are presented with you are unable to face reality and admit you are wrong.”
🤡
I quoted organizations in Ukraine about there being a genocide. You really are disgusting for lying so much.
Here is the only quote I made regarding Gaza:
“According to a United Nations special committee, Amnesty International, and many other experts and rights organisations, Israel has committed genocide against the Palestinian people during its ongoing invasion and bombing of the Gaza Strip as part of the Gaza war.[34][35][36]”
See the part where it says Israel committed genocide?
Still waiting on your response about the lies you told to begin with about verified sources in Ukraine though. Clown behavior 🤡 keep up the own goals though. I must be talking to a child with all the baseless nonsense you come up with. Grow up little bro.
Still no response. Gotcha.
🤡
None of that happened. I’m the guy who said both are genocides. It’s really pathetic you have to outright lie. Israel is committing genocide. See? So pathetic because you’re denying genocide in Ukraine by Russia. You’re disgusting.
🤡
Hey, still waiting on your response 17 hours later about why Russian propaganda is a “good example”, “directly applicable” and whatever other nonsense you spouted without any verification from independent sources.
“Notice the difference between my sources: independent international bodies and your sources: pro-Ukraine organisations.”
Remember that? Hypocrite.
“It appears no matter how many facts you are presented with you are unable to face reality and admit you are wrong.”
🤡
I’m so sick of that person. All over the tech community with horrible and downright stupid takes. Just a while ago they were complaining about bloatware installed on android phones, but then fails to see your point about proprietary software also being useless or abandoned.
They’ll block you if you point that out and call it “harassment”.
I see that person everywhere. 2k comments in 3 months. They genuinely do not know much of anything. I tagged them as “bad faith actor/unintelligent”. Best to avoid engaging with them.
What other brands are available to use for iOS?
Funny you got downvoted for this considering Proton’s controversies recently.
The apps do suck. I’ll be leaving them.
To anyone reading - this person is intentionally obtuse.
PebbleOS was sold to Fitbit, Fitbit sold to Google, Google made PebbleOS open source this year. It couldn’t have been made before.
That guy is intentionally obtuse and acts in bad faith. Pebble’s IP and software were sold to Fitbit. Then Google bought Fitbit. Then Google made PebbleOS open source this year. It couldn’t be made until now.
I randomly came across you and saw the tag I left you. Lol
“No you” really? Are you a child?
Lord have mercy.
User A stated that property damage is not violence.
User B expanded on that topic (not a derailment because it is relevant. A derailment would be them talking about another topic, example: music) and challenged the scope of different definitions of violence. You ignored this.
When you asked User B if they agree that property damage is violence, they stated their position that yes, it can be.
There are TWO different people, with TWO different opinions, and you are mixing them up.
Really? I came across you again. Still acting in bad faith, huh? The founder Eric likes his Pebble watches, and wants to make it again. What is with you and your lack of understanding? How hard is that to believe?
See? Still bad faith.
The other user elaborated to you on the importance of context. They challenged the definitions of violence. You basically responded “I was right” with very simple ideas. They didn’t admit anything later, because their position remained the same throughout. You saying otherwise is the bad faith part. It is okay if you don’t understand the complexities, but it is bad faith to misrepresent that other user.
See? Bad faith.
Based on your bad faith acting. Ya know, the whole conversation up above.
The initial claim was made by a different user. The user you’re talking about elaborated on the importance of context, so they didn’t contradict themselves.
With reading comprehension like that…
Okay prove it.
Still waiting on your response 20 hours later about the propaganda you used as a good example.
Honestly I’m done talking to a lying child. Grow up little bro.