That’s what I don’t get about this. The point is either to get out of paying or at least make it very difficult. At the same time the cost to Disney as a company with all the bad press and fall out from doing this would be orders of magnitude greater than simply paying the widower compensation. Who signed off on it? The idea that a lawyer can do what ever it takes to win a case while simultaneously destroying the company they work for seems dumb as shit from a purely financial point of view.

Who thinks like this? And why? Tbh I don’t really care why

Who cares that’s ages away /s

I think it’s why he drifted right. He couldn’t handle being called out on his bullshit so he needed to find a group of people who wouldn’t question him

As someone who knows nothing about this stuff, yes.

So they’re not changing names? The headline says they voted to do it, then it kind of says later that the vote failed?

deleted by creator

I feel like a lot of this is exported from America. There certainly seems to be some lag between the nonsense we see in the us and the rest of the world

In the USA

Cool so we can just make up our own rules now. Well, all Microsoft products are freeware now because the same reason this guy

Do you remember if you got an answer?

Yes but it’s hard for these people to put a price the feeling they get from oppressing people

I haven’t no

To be fair it really wasn’t that loud

I thought they got rid of that from the list altogether when they realized they couldn’t not be evil while simultaneously maximizing profits

Probably written by ChatGPT

With a vengeance

Libertarians assemble!

My guacamole futures just went through the roof

Poorly built rocket