I was more of talking about if the program was actually performing as advertised. Guess I could have phrased that better.

I am all for this bs AI bubble popping. Extra points for it being China who did it, since there is a bunch of American propaganda fed about how China is pure evil.

Supposedly, it is open source. So, we will find out IF it is very soon.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4g32yxpdz0o

We bouta get space factories before affordable housing.

“Too big to fail” = “We cannot give real concequences for bad actions, but we can take a cut after the fact in the form of a weak ass fee.”

Yo, who tf downvoted this?

He probably was not creating it to be a soulless cash grab.

Brb, grabbing my popcorn.

Dream on. If smart glasses gain a massive amount of users in 2025, I’ll put a sock in my mouth. Still not enough reason to carry around both smart glasses and a smart phone. Smart watches already are there for tech enthusiasts and they can always go with a VR headset to get a hardcore AR experience.

Good watch to explain why the Judge is a dick.

https://youtu.be/GmDNz7irGgw?si

Thank goodness they didn’t ban Donghua Jinlong’s food grade glycine!

If you bury your head deep enough into propaganda to not see reality, they are!

Not really, everyone who uses generative AI is either aware and doesn’t care or doesn’t care to be aware.

https://www.businessofapps.com/data/linkedin-statistics/

LinkedIn generated $15.7 billion revenue in 2023, an increase of 7.4% year-on-year

Basically, Goodrazi got touchy when asked about his organization’s efforts to neutralize government-spearheaded free tax filing programs. He hit back that Patel’s question — the editor said that Intuit is “legendary for lobbying against free direct federal e-filing” and then straightforwardly asked how much of their budget is allocated towards lobbying efforts — was “fundamentally” based in the “wrong premise” and was “inaccurate,” before declaring that Intuit doesn’t “lobby against free.”

Wishing you all the luck.

Money