I prefer native music apps because, in my experience, they offer a smoother experience compared to PWA. I don’t mind using PWA, but the Music Assistant PWA sometimes annoys me with its delay in loading items.

I had issues with HACS version once and also switched to docker. That way, I could add a health check to restart the container in case something breaks.

You can check out music streaming servers such as Navidrome (Jellyfin also works) for that together with a compatible client such as symphonium This is a closed source app but the most feature complete. I use Tempo but has no android auto support I believe.

Glad to see Music Assistant is getting updates. It is the only way to keep my Sonos speakers working as the Sonos app hardly ever works for me.

I used them in parallel for a while before switching to AdGuard. The key features that mattered to me were support for upstream DNS servers via DoH, detailed query logs, and wildcard domain rewriting. Also a better looking UI is a plus.

Good news! Hope they implement detailed query log and support for upstream DoH DNS next.

There is a discussion about immich stacking here https://github.com/immich-app/immich/discussions/2479 Automatic stacking is on their roadmap. There is a high chance that the APIs will be broken by then. I always prefer the native features over third party tools.

Sorry for that, Updated the title.

They are closing all issues citing piracy https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues?q=is%3Aissue+piracy+is%3Aclosed

It used to work last year 😀 . The debian yt-dlp version: [email protected] is giving a different error

ERROR: [Einthusan] 9r1H: 9r1H: Failed to parse JSON (caused by JSONDecodeError(“Expecting value in ‘’: line 1 column 1 (char 0)”)); please report this issue on https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp/issues?q= , filling out the appropriate issue template. Confirm you are on the latest version using yt-dlp -U

this update broke my installation :(. I have not updated it in a while. Now I have to rollback until I fix this. Hope the backup will work. EDIT: It was the reverse proxy. Check the developer notes before updating.

I am behind CGNAT and I have been trying to set up a WireGuard mesh network to connect my local devices, such as a Raspberry Pi and Proxmox server, as well as my mobile devices, using a VPS as the central point. The goal is to expose locally running applications to the internet without relying on Cloudflare, as they do not allow video streaming and remote access to my local devices. I have looked at many tutorials on this topic, but they often left me confused due to the varying iptables rules and configurations. Some tutorials include specific device names like eth0 in the iptables rules, while others use variables like %i. Additionally, some examples have special rules for SSH access like this one. Apart from that, I am unsure about what additional steps I need to take when I want to run one of the peers as an internet gateway. Despite the confusion, I managed to achieve the basic mesh network setup without implementing any iptables rules for PostUp/Down. Each device in the network receives an IP address within the WireGuard subnet (10.0.0.x) and can ping one another. However, I believe that the iptables rules mentioned in the tutorials would allow accessing other subnets, such as my local LAN, through the WireGuard VPN. I am still uncertain about the exact mechanism behind how these rules work in that context and how to properly configure them for my specific use case, especially considering the CGNAT situation

Thanks for the nice writeup. Can you explain why you have these rules.

PostUp = iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -i eth0 ‘!’ --dport 22 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.2; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j SNAT --to-source SERVER-IP PostUp = iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p udp -i eth0 ‘!’ --dport 55107 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.2;

What happens if you remove it ?

Immich having accounts+SSO is the single best feature IMO. Thanks for your thoughts on the topic.

I faced the same problem when trying to run two SSDs connected via USB in btrfs raid0. I used a cheap 30W power brick from amazon. You can see dmsg warnings about this. Look for low voltage/current. Problems were resolved after using the official Raspberry 5 power brick.

I see the option now, Thanks 😄

Thank you! I am making a comment so I can find this thread later.

Now I have to self host mastodon to join the party 🥳