Norbert, Norbina, Morbert, Morbina, Hassio, Nassio

That’s pretty much how it always goes. This is essentially an expo of “what we can do with a crazy high budget” not “this is what we are releasing next year.”

Wait, you think using Firefox somehow results in them getting money?…

New to the internet?

Totps only works when both source and recipient are synced pretty much identically in time. Meaning the car and fob would need to receive their time from an external source.

Not that hard in many places, just grab the time from a radio broadcast. But what happens when that broadcast isn’t available? You fall back on a known inaccurate time. I’ve seen cars with a bum RTC chip, which lost about a minute a day. That would be enough to kill off this kind of system.

Not to mention that an external time source would be larger, cost more, require more power, and would be vulnerable to brand new attacks.

There is no perfect system. Take your physical lock for instance, there is no unpickable lock. They just plum don’t exist.

Car manufacturers should also be held liable for losses due to lack of protection against jamming.

Did you mean something else here? You can’t “protect” against jamming. That’s like protecting from too much noise in a conversation.

I mean, there’s another side to this.

Assume you have exacting control of training data. You give it consensual sexual play, including rough play, bdsm play, and cnc play. We are 100% certain the content is consensual in this hypothetical.

Is the output a grey area, even if it seems like real rape?

Now another hypothetical. A person closes their eyes and imagines raping someone. “Real” rape. Is that a grey area?

Let’s build on that. Let’s say this person is a talented artist, and they draw out their imagined rape scene, which we are 100% certain is a non-consensual scene imagined by the artist. Is this a grey area?

We can build on that further. What if they take the time to animate this scene? Is that a grey area?

When does the above cross into a problem? Is it the AI making something that seems like rape but is built on consensual content? The thought of a person imagining a real rape? The putting of that thought onto a still image? The animating?

Or is it none of them?

This isn’t really even bad communication. This is idiots with a platform screaming FUD for attention.

Yup. But FUD must be pumped out.

This seems overly optimistic. One thing current algorithms can’t do is adapt to previously unknown situations. Yeah, they can potentially model out a solution if they have enough known factors, but they don’t currently have true problem solving capabilities.

Can that change? Absolutely. But the closest we’ve come to is LLMs which essentially download the entirety of the internet to see what the “most average response” would be to any given situation. But give it something it’s truly never seen before and you get pure gibberish that sounds convincing. And even then it’s just bad.

Cars crash into buildings all the time. Even if you took the largest consumer car and “drove” it as fast as possible into the side of a skyscraper, you wouldn’t be able to cause anything close to another 9/11.

That said, these are terrible for other reasons.

Don’t use chromium?

Not just reading. A while back, some ISPs moved towards replacing DNS queries to known DNS servers with their own replies.

There’s also something to be said about some services being cordoned off in a VPN while leaving some public with security. I don’t necessarily want everyone within my full network if all I want is to share one service with them.

You don’t eat dairy cows.

Why don’t we just throw Lemmy behind wireguard while we’re at it.

Literally anything can go behind a VPN. Doesn’t mean much at all. And the majority of those are commonly left on the open internet for friends and family, which would be annoying af to set up with WireGuard.

I have enough issues dealing with VPN issues in my professional life, I don’t want to have to deal with them in my personal life as well.

Don’t yuck other people’s yum.

It can be unencrypted, but isn’t a requirement.

Seriously?

Plex, Jellyfin, VaultWarden, AdGuard, Home Assistant, GameVault, any flavor of pastebin, any flavor of wiki, and the list goes on.

If you’re feeling spicy throw whatever the hell you want onto a reverse proxy and put it behind a zero trust login.

The idea that opening up anything at all through to the open internet is “dumb” is antiquated. Are there likely concerns that need to be addressed? Absolutely. But don’t make blanket statements about virtually nothing belonging on the open internet.

This is very short sighted. I can think of dozens of things to put on the open internet that aren’t inherently public. The majority are things for sharing with multiple people you want to have logins for. As long as the exposed endpoints are secure, there’s no inherent problem.