

Simple questions with known answers might be a way to weed out malicious/untrustworthy responders.
Cyberpunk Fashion
Website: https://www.jilanico.com
Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@Jilanico
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jilanico
Simple questions with known answers might be a way to weed out malicious/untrustworthy responders.
The Gemini logo next to the word “Experiment” makes me suspicious.
Are they trying to train an AI?
Dual booting is also an option.
If the ad is short and subsidizes free wifi, I ain’t mad. But if the ad is unreasonably long, or if I have to keep watching ads every x minutes to use WiFi, it becomes a problem. Not sure what the case is here, but it should be spelled out on the screen so we know what we’re getting ourselves into.
Costs €5 but you can only play it once
Jokes aside, cool concept :)
Isn’t chromium open source? How are the APIs a secret?
What if they kept the green color just to troll…
I was on the edge of my seat the whole time. I think it’s the shorter race duration and the smaller track that makes it easy to take in all the action. In real races, super fast cars on long tracks look slow on video.
Hahaha omg it IS amazing lol https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA8BoiT_ZmQ
Hell, even marbles are more fun to watch imo: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6wjQ1_icRUg
That makes them a humongous database
I understand why you’re saying that, but I personally don’t agree. As AIs face legal challenges, maybe your opinion will be adopted, we’ll see.
I really do not believe midjourney is storing all the files on the Internet in a humongous database. They are just exposing the AI to them for training just like you expose your computer to them when you visit with your web browser. I’m happy to be wrong about this, but I’m just not convinced. Please try to keep your temper.
I don’t think anyone is advocating to legalize the sale of copyrighted material made via AI.
When you look at a picture of the joker online, your browser is caching an image file of the joker on your computer. Is that not an illegal copy?
The framebuffer on your computer copies the data to display the font to you. That’s my point. Not every form of copying infringes on copyright.
Developed nations are seeing declining birth rates. I don’t think we need to do anything.
Every time someone raised the alarm about population growth, some unforeseen innovation made it a non-issue.
The stuff I sell on jilanico.com? Enough to make it worth my while.
That’s a good point. Musicians have been known to accidentally reproduce the same beat as another musician (was is done subconsciously or just coincidence?). Some books are strikingly similar to other books that it makes you wonder if it was a rip off or just coincidence. So it’s nothing new, but it may become more prevalent with AI. This could spawn a new industry of investigators ensuring your AI generated art isn’t infringing on any copyrights 🤔
It’s probably supposed to be a Godzilla-like creature.