This very article.
And one batch of the 45WE EMU (electric multiple unit, the kind of train that doesn’t have a separate engine up front to pull the passenger cars), would switch off automatically when passing through the Mińsk Mazowiecki railway station. Trains full of passengers were left stranded.
Well, yeah. The people who host them for profit should be held liable.
you write it in a special programming language, which is basically English, which describes how you want to see this application in a very specified way
A derivative of English, with different syntax and rules to help eliminate ambiguities? We in the industry tend to call that “code”.
I mean, that’s how it used to be when I was growing up.
The fact that “how it used to be” in your childhood produced a scumbag like you is a compelling argument to not let people’s childhoods be like that anymore.
Have never seen a link to a “Trending” page or a “Trending Now” list in any of those spots.
Goddamnit, why can’t we get a militia that does some PRODUCTIVE sabotage?
I’m not really sure that being open source here means much of anything, but an SO alternative definitely sounds good. Thanks for the tip.
Use of AI (actually Machine Learning) in the medical field has been going on for a LONG time, and has nothing to do with the recent explosion of mostly-useless LLMs. And even if this weren’t the case, the way some technology was developed kinda doesn’t matter a whole lot when it’s going to be put through a rigorous testing process to determine it’s actual efficacy. Which is what this article is talking about: taking a drug that’s already gone through a bunch of non-human testing and moving to the next step.
I know the US government is doing its damndest to dismantle safety regulations, avross all industries, but I don’t think we’re quite at the point that we should be alarmed at new possible cancer treatments.
Sounds loke she found the line for being a fall guy that she wasn’t willing to cross.
Not that anyone really believed Elon isn’t calling all the shots here.
They wouldn’t be able to make MONEY off of AI, otherwise, cause most people would decline it.
No question, this is what the moneymen want. They see programmers (all human employees, really) as a liability.
Then the second part of my statement applies.
Not to short-circuit the joke, but in this case, it’s because the valid JavaScript version is…
let a
…and one of TypeScript’s main design goals is to be a superset of JavaScript, that only adds syntax, and doesn’t re-write it.
Beyond that, it’s probably a case of some new language just using what the designer is familiar with.
That’s a perfectly valid approach, yes. We do exactly this, at work. It’s pretty common, if not ubiquitous, to have your database schema consist of not only structure, but data as well. We call it static data, and it’s all defined in deployable scripts, just like our tables and views are. If ISO makes changes to the dataset, then it’s just a table update to match it. And ISO is nice about keeping backwards compatibility inb their standards.
Since this is not strictly your own data, you could also go with just storing the code value on your tables, and letting the UI layer do the lookup, either with built-in features of your language/framework, or with a static csv file, like you mention. You may not want to do this for static data that is entirely your own, like, say, a status or type enum, since it makes your database schema less-self-descriptive, and more prone to becoming invalid.
You could also set the country code up as a not-strictly-enforced foreign key, where your app will lookup additional info (E.G. the proper name) for a country code, if it’s a standard one, but just skip that if it’s not a standard one.
It’s up to you what you think is most appropriate.
Oh, certainly not.