We do need a rigorous review process. Just accepting substandard papers and mal attribution from a bum duck nowhere “university” is unacceptable.

That being said the current way of monetization and margins are also bad. And we might need higher standards.

Sarcasm. Pretty clear to me.

Crashlands 2 is pretty good and quirky.

There is nothing indicating success that I spotted.

While this does fit this community’s subject broadly this does not feel like a discussion that should have a place anywhere.

A student did a righteous dum-dum. Some people use it to further their political goals. There is zero meat on this story.

Why are you doing that recreationally? How are you different from a researcher?

Why are you using a home server for that?

Why are you doing that on a network storage as opposed to on device?

Also who got millions of photos at home?

Ok, but what are they doing that moves loads of random files?

I was trying to convey confusion as to what a cheap microcomputer could even be used for that needs that much fast storage. They ought not to be using it for scientific compute, that’s for sure.

That works with a raspberry? Those tiny 10€ microcomputers? Color me impressed.

Do you really need the SSDs for that? I would have guessed that hdds are plenty fine.

Does Samsung even sell a small SSD? I thought they start at like 128GB

M2 slots are standard for more than a decade.

Fair point. What the fuck are you doing with it?

SATA is not intended for fast storage devices but bulk storage, at this point.

Ok. But then you are not a regular person running a regular home server but an enthusiast with small scale commercial needs.

And most are wrong or unnecessary. What movie requires SSD performance?

If you need SATA SSDs you are not a home user.

Just use a HDD for your bulk needs and a SSD m2.

Why would the law make an explicit difference? If the value is sufficiently low and an owner cannot be located with appropriate effort, take it.

Also if they still had a significant value and the owner would still like them a passerby claiming then seems injust to.me.

They still belong to the owner is the issue at hand, I believe. I.e. taking them would be theft.

The issue is that the owner is easily known.