You can say assholes on the internet

Yay, more ways to abuse animals

Thats not gonna be fun on the other end…

If only it were so simple, particularly in a profession that is historically ageist. It’s a fuckin shame what she did to her face, but there was no small amount of pressure from a number of angles that caused her to do that.

Fair enough, seems I may have been quick to judge, but i still have a hard time understanding why they’d take the position they have in this case.

Thanks to this fucking cunt:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Boasberg

Your terminology is all wonky here…

Downloading is copying a file from the network onto the local device. Installation extracts files to the appropriate directories, makes config changes, etc… “Installed from a local source” doesnt make sense, as any file you would install you would first need to download or pull off of some other media.

And thats just the beginning:

https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

Ive never had fresh Marula fruit, but this shit is good, and its made from it

https://www.totalwine.com/spirits/liqueurscordialsschnapps/cream/amarula-fruit-cream-liqueur/p/94325750

Would it be the first relic made in a factory? The first with a battery? I’m sure Sony would love this in any case. Some serious PR.

Dame Rachel told BBC Newsnight: “Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it’s absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that’s one of my major recommendations.”

If this fucker had any idea what VPN even stood for they’d realize how fuckin stupid this statement is…

Time for TST to start distributing literature through the ranks of the federal government

I’m sure they’ll have the “science” ready in time for Luigi’s trial

but do no work to disprove what they already believe.

But that’s the LAWYERS job /s

So there’s two "X"s, only one more before things get really interesting…

having free copies of the content available on the internet decreases the desire for people to obtain paid copies of the data.

According to who?

Nice, they intend to donate any financial gains from the lawsuit (assuming they win, and after covering their own court fees, I’m sure).

The startup claims that all use of AI for the military will be consistent with OpenAI usage guidelines, which are determined by OpenAI itself.

Translation: “I do what I want”

Confused the shit out of me for a sec

After some further reading it seems obvious that the two incidents are entirely unrelated, but it was a fun rabbit hole for a sec!