It’s pretty obvious from the context.
“Environmentally friendly”? No, they use crazy amounts of power.
“High-paying, long-term” jobs? Working in a data center may be in the tech field, but it doesn’t offer what people think of as “tech money” and your opportunity for advancement is slim. Data centers also don’t need to employ large numbers of people. They just suck up space and resources.
Edit:
The data center industry’s demand for electricity is growing so much that it could threaten Washington’s efforts to transition to a carbon-free power grid…
The original bill required each data center to create at least 35 permanent positions at 150% of the surrounding area’s average personal income.
A second bill, approved just a month after lawmakers passed the first tax break, gave recipients the choice between creating 35 jobs or just three positions per 20,000 square feet of server farm space, whichever was less.
Oh look, I was right. Could have told you all that before the state wasted money on this.
Is it because they are all corrupt and/or ineffective? Or is it the voters’ fault? Clearly, it’s the voters who are wrong.
This wouldn’t have even made a difference in the assassination attempt.
we’re obviously going to be paying more in AC because it’s hot.
That actually is how it usually works.
That’s only going to get worse as climate change worsens living conditions for people around the world. Politicians need to do something about it, are basically the only ones who can do anything about it, but maybe/probably won’t.
All the fast food workers in Ohio should start making sure that they they get some good bones in there every time they go for fast food chicken.
The politicians who are against it are the vast minority, they’re just extremely vocal and irritating.
Despite my criticisms, I use Amazon Prime Video quite a lot. It’s one of the best platforms for finding random horror movies, and that’s totally my jam.
By design to get you to pay for more services.
I’m not familiar with how popular she is or is not among unaffiliated voters. That matters more than how Republicans feel about her.
That’s just idiotic. This has absolutely nothing to do with her being black or a woman. She’s just not well liked and that can happen regardless of her sex or skin color.
I would say that her problem is very different than Hillary’s. Hillary was not popular with Democrats and she was hated by Republicans. AOC is loved by some Democrats, liked by a bunch, and disliked by some while being absolutely reviled by Republicans. That would get AOC more support than Hillary got.
She’s a politician. She’s never going to get a job in management.
How is that even remotely relevant to what that person said? They’re not talking about policies, they’re talking about popularity and ability to win an election.
Because nobody particularly likes Kamala Harris.
I guess they are under the false assumption that the platform spreading disinformation is unintentional and undesired.