• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 16 days ago
cake
Cake day: May 6th, 2025

help-circle

  • You have the ability to choose an insurance company that doesn’t use those things. Hell, you even have the ability to self-insure in most states with enough collateral. Nothing is being forced on you. Hell - you EVEN have the ability to hire an in-person insurance agent – did you know that?

    Sure, it’s not as cheap - but you’ve always been able to do this. You are not being forced like you claim, your own ignorance is what betrays you to the options you have available.

    And what other people do with their ingestion of AI is their business, not yours.

    Without AI, all of the things you say they are doing WITH AI were already possible. They could ALREADY spy on employees. They could ALREADY lie and manipulate people. All AI does is make it happen on a wider scale.

    So instead of attacking “AI” “AI” “AI”…why not attack the things that are being done wrong, rather than the fact that it’s AI?



  • No, because you use the uppermost-bound of the statement. Your opinion doesn’t take precident as the opinion above it (polluting the river) already violates the rights of others. Your opinion literally is the same as mine. That the person polluting the river (their opinion being they can) - shouldn’t be able to use that opinion to affect others. You’re saying the same as I am, but focused on the wrong part.

    Like with religion – You’re free to believe whatever you want to believe. That you’re not allowed to have abortions, etc.

    But the moment YOUR belief, says that I can’t have an abortion, is when it becomes invalid, because it’s not MY belief. I don’t have to abide by YOUR belief/opinion on the matter. Your opinions don’t dictate my actions.

    Now, you can control your actions - by, say - not buying from me. You control your actions, so while you can’t force companies not to AI, there’s nothing forcing you to buy from them when you are aware of its use. You can’t stop them from using it because you don’t like it though. Your opinion of it being good/bad, or if they can/should/shouldn’t use it matters absolutely none.






  • “In fact, asking the chatbot comes across worse than not asking for help at all.”

    Hey, wouldn’t want anyone to be self sufficient and want to complete a task on their own or anything! Remain dumb! Don’t search! Just throw your hands up and go “I don’t know!” and then don’t do ANYTHING!

    Yeah. Completely sane thinking…

    Every search you’ve ever done for information on the internet, has been steeped in the beginnings of what LLMs are today. LLMs are the culmination of the work done on search engines to find words and phrases relation to other words. Even the ones that aren’t “chatbots”, use similar methodology to try and get you what you’re looking for. That’s what propelled Google to the top of search.












  • I … quite literally … showed you it working… flawlessly. Today. Now. The only thing someone needs to do is make the pipeline to do it all automatically. It’s literally already possible, right now. You’re denying what is right in front of you. This isn’t a “in 50 years” thing, this is a … Netflix will probably have auto-dubbed, auto-lip-sync as an option in their library in the next year or less.

    The only thing stopping this from happening would be SAG-AFTRA fighting against the re-dubs because they want their actors to make even more money even though their characters didn’t do any extra work.

    It’s only a matter of time before someone ends up doing it anyways, regardless. This isn’t a futuristic fever dream, it’s already possible NOW.

    Absolutely hilarious that I show you a picture perfect example of its use, and you’re counter-claiming that it’s a pipe dream and not as good as I say…when the proof is literally right in front of you.