We do not collect data from sites and users as claimed by [email protected].
I have a faint inkling of how a service like yours would work and I do not see any way it could work without doing just that. Since both users and site owners need to create an account.
Seriously stop protesting so much. It makes you look bad.
No misconceptions on my side.
Your business is about three things:
Both these things are what makes the hype around web privacy/anonymity.
You pinky swear that you don’t sell or otherwise abuse personal data, but you still get class A data about which users visit and deeply interact with which site.
Why should I lay all my eggs in one basket in the first place?
Of course the same could be said about a secondary or tertiary email provider but then quite a few exist who are at least as trustworthy as your solution.
I said your business is about three things; I think it’s easy to see that the first two lead to you growing your business.
About your elaborate emoji- and buzzword-laden replies, let me reply with Shakespeare: “The lady doth protest too much, methinks”
People have every right and reason to be extremely skeptical about offers like these.
BTW I deleted one of my comments because I realized I was wrong. That seems to have rubbed you the wrong way?
deleted by creator
Regarding those screenshots:
But then visitors immediately have to create an account with pportal .io to actually get at the newsletter/sign-up/etc.?
I had a quick look at your main page but it did not answer that question.
I understand that a web dev who wants to offer this has to open an account or get an api key of they want to use your service.
Also I could not find a link to the git repo.
edit: according to OP’s answer it is as I thought. Yet another company that collects data both on sites and their visitors. Another iteration of the good old Free model a lá Google.
edit2: my personal recommendation is still that people get themselves at least one extra email account with plus-addressing. From a trusted provider of course.
edit3: an option for true aliases would of course be better
The meaning of Honeypot you refer to is a metaphor. It’s not wrong to use it in other ways.
According to this, for me it would be Ubuntu 10.04. It was my final step away from $PROPRIETARY_OS, way back when.
Or, you know, all of them.
In case anyone had the same kneejerk reaction: no, this is not about privacy etc. Just performance, according to OOP.
Still, this reads like a reaction to a recent overblown debacle.
edit: no, it actually does say “hardened security” in the README, lol, but the whole project seems to boil down to some compiler flags.
And I’m going to use that bill for myself too if you don’t mind, because nobody gets treated worse than I do online, nobody.
This shitstain constantly sounds like a parody of himself. Yet I’m still not laughing, except in that really ugly way that sticks in your throat.
If you can’t edit XML use nice GUI lxhotkey or obkey instead
The laughing is bad, but the prankees reactions have informational value: this is how a significant portion of the populace thinks about the conflict.
Done differently this could’ve been great investigative journalism: “of 100 randomly chosen numbers we called only 1 reacted positively” or so.
Openbox (LXQt’s wm under Xorg) does support global shortcuts.
And labwc supports rc.xml so it should support global shortcuts as well.
I wish people would stop spreading tropes like these. While the USA as a whole has the highest GDP globally there are better ways of measuring how rich a country is.