I have a high tolerance for technical stuff, but quite honestly I am overwhelmed by the *arr tools. I have never been able to understand exactly what they each do, how to make them work together, and what the prerequisites are, e.g. a Usenet account.
Should it not say “machine code” then? It would still be bizarre to call it obsolete, given that it’s literally the foundation of all the other languages in the chart. It’s like saying letters are obsolete because we have words now.
Do you support their radioactive poop entering the municipal water treatment plant?
Radioactive shrimp cured my autism. How dare the LIBERALs try to take away our Freedom Foods! Give me seafood sovereignty or give me death!
Listen up, computer, I’m typing NOW. Not whenever you get around to polling the USB device. Sheesh.
The first @ was silent, duh
Sounds like you were a 1337 H4X0R back in the day
Did you tell him about fuzzers yet?
On that note, I suspect that a 25% tax is cheaper by far than the cost of building out state of the art silicon fab on US soil, plus the additional cost of paying Americans to do the manufacturing/assembly. Would you rather buy an iPhone for $1250 or $4000?
I’m disturbed that an elevator is running a desktop OS. How did this happen? Did they never hear of microcontrollers?
I love when there are so many rules that my first few randomly-generated passwords are rejected.
I don’t do much frontend work these days, but years ago, it felt like the defining feature of Bootstrap was the 12-column layout. Sure, it had fun buttons and other components, but the ability to trivially define multi-column layout without ripping your hair out was its raison d’être.
Now that we have flexbox, I’m not sure anyone needs Bootstrap.
I don’t get the concern trolling?
This implies to me that you disagree with the post, which says corporations are deliberately deskilling people with LLMs.
But others losing their coding skills because they are lazy? I don’t know if that’s even a problem. Those that want to learn learn. Those who do not, will never code.
I agree, and am skeptical that LLMs will make people lose their skills.
So, I don’t think corporations are de-skilling people.
My point of clarification is that I think they are de-valuing their labor.
None of my comment is indicative of being even close to what strawman argument you are hating on
What’s the strawman argument?
I do not hate you! Why do you keep repeating that?
No hate over here. I don’t even disagree with you. I just found it funny that you’re so vehemently arguing that vibe coding won’t rot your brain, but you tried to express it with a nonsensical “if then” statement.
Edit: To clarify, I do think there’s a concerted effort to devalue software engineers. CEOs are pretending that junior engineers can be replaced by LLMs and that senior engineers can get more done in less time with LLMs. I’m deeply skeptical of these claims, and I think they’re lying through their teeth in order to drive their stock prices up in the short term, and software engineer salaries down in the medium/long term. So, I don’t think LLMs are as competent as they claim. I also don’t think they’ll rot your brain if you choose to “vibe code”.
If it’s so bad, use it, if you don’t want to, don’t.
Sounds like the kind of logic a vibe coder would write 🤔
Lieutenant Commander Dat Ass
Yeah, exactly. I don’t get it.
You can’t do incremental builds with just. I don’t see how it’s a replacement?
I’ve been making a similar point for years now — I don’t need any help generating bullshit, I’m already very good at it.