Note that I’m not necessarily opposed to her facing consequences for killing him – my issue is with how gleefully NYPost is framing it as if she just attacked him out of the blue and shoehorning her into the “evil transgenders” stereotype
Note that I’m not necessarily opposed to her facing consequences for killing him – my issue is with how gleefully NYPost is framing it as if she just attacked him out of the blue and shoehorning her into the “evil transgenders” stereotype
That’s my point, gender has no relation to violent crimes, bringing it up in the headline is just bigoted
It was kind of a factor in that the mailman called her a f****t and that would be misgendering but Im not going to suggest that was the Post’s motivation
This might be an important detail to put in the post, but in the headline? It makes no sense past bigotry
I take issue with OP’s headline and the Post’s.
I agree, OP makes it out like it wasn’t an extreme act of violence, even though it did start as self defence.
Was the mailman armed? If not i can’t really frame stabbing someone with a knife as self-defense.
It was never self defense. She starts the fight by spitting on the guy which is assault.