• Buckshot@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    13 hours ago

    In UK in 2010, 10 new nuclear plants were announced. Since then 5 older plants have been shut leaving us with 5 active. 1 of the 10 new ones started construction and it’s massively over budget and delayed.

    In the same time we’ve added about 20GW of solar.

    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      New nuclear plants take like 10 years to build, and need to plan out a 50+ year useful life in order to be worth the up-front construction costs.

      I wonder what the state of energy production in 2075 will be, where a nuclear power plant designed in 2025 and completed in 2035 will still have 10 years in order to break even on cost, competing with whatever the state of the art is on generation in 2075. Fusion? Widespread solar+wind+geothermal+batteries? Something we haven’t even dreamed of?

      That’s why I’m skeptical of nuclear fission these days. It locks us in too long.

      • paranoia@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I’m all in on solar for most places.

        Sure it uses a bit more land, but it makes no noise, no pollution, there’s zero risk of an accident, no targets for terrorism and your grid isn’t completely shut down if it is somehow turned offline.

        You don’t depend on others for your own resilience. No need for oil, gas or uranium.

        Unless you live in the high northern latitudes, there is almost no reason to not be building a durable and resilient battery-renewable grid

        • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Solar should be in every parking lot and the median of every highway as the baseline, already space we’ve developed and can (more) easily add to.