• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Ok… Data redundancy is a possible application… I will tentatively say that’s a feasible goal, if still probably a stupid one.

    I mean, how often do data centers upgrade storage drives? Cause the cost of doing that in space is… unreasonable.

    • Semperverus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      It would depend on how critical the data is and if the cost benefit analysis breaks even or tips in favor of the moon. I would imagine housing state secrets up there would be reasonable, and documents (text files) don’t take up a huge amount of space. Video would be more challenging. But realistically you could probably store all of the Secret and Top Secret documents across a few servers with maybe 5 drives in a RAID config each. Probably even a single NAS-like solution.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean, yeah, you could do that.

        I’m not sure if it would be better than a secret underground base… But you could do it.

        With an underground base you could even have the one connection to it be a hard-line, not wireless. You could construct it with a smaller crew, easier to keep under wraps. And I expect that would still be less than 1/100th the price of building it on the moon.

        Anyway, I do think the ultimate off site data storage location is a pretty entertaining idea, i’d bet it could make sense for some things, I just can’t imagine what.