She acknowledges herself as the initiator/ aggressor in her Facebook post here:
In this post she
acknowledges that she initiated the attack.
acknowledges that the drink wasn’t hers.
states why she initiated the attack (online harassment?)
claims she didn’t make physical contact (video evidence challenges/ refutes this), but this is contradicted by her earlier statement.
and acknowledges that she picked up a deadly weapon.
To those who think the woman was justified in their conduct here, you very much want her to get a good lawyer. Because her own words, along with the video, go very strongly against the narrative which people trying to set up here, that she was justified in her use of force along the escalation ladder.
Look how non aggressive he is. He definitely didn’t stand up and b-line to kick her while she’s down
Listen man, if you want to deny her aggression that preceded all this that’s fine, but don’t act like you’re standing up for women while doing so.
You’re denying basic agency to women, you misogynist.
She acknowledges herself as the initiator/ aggressor in her Facebook post here:
In this post she
To those who think the woman was justified in their conduct here, you very much want her to get a good lawyer. Because her own words, along with the video, go very strongly against the narrative which people trying to set up here, that she was justified in her use of force along the escalation ladder.
SHE’S THREATENING HIS LIFE SOMEBODY STOP HER.
Justified response.
This is how you’re worthless brain works?
Shut the fuck up idiot.