• Garbagio@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Not to defend the person, but he didn’t say worse, just, just as bad. Which, in the immediate term, absolutely not. But, long term, you would still have the mass rollout of surveillance, a tits-up economy built around AI companies, the continued upward transfer of wealth, the continued genocide in Gaza, Israel invading southern Jordan, etc. Less food recalls, same exact food shortages because of climate change. Kamala would have been a better steward of a system that would long-term fuck us all the same. You have to realize that every single thing you’re pissed Democrats haven’t fought hard against the Trump admin doing, Kamala would have done.

    • AviAdi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes but we would actually have a militant uprising against the federal government. I think that is what is truly needed and we need the right wing to join in. That’s why voting Democrat is important, the sooner the federal government gets attacked and destroyed the better the country is

        • AviAdi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Destroying the federal government of the USA is the only way we make it better. Like destroying Washington DC should be everyone’s goal. That’s the only way out? There is no future for this country without violent revolution against tyrants.