• greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It was a gift, no?

    Who are you to tell me what to do with a gift. Its mine after you give it.

    Software industry understands neither property nor consent.

    • stark@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Okay but then you are still a liar if you pretend to be a content creator so you can source free keys to flip. Why is a dev not allowed to be upset when they got duped by a liar?

    • punchmesan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think that’s stretching the definition of “gift” a bit far, no? A gift doesn’t come with strings attached (even if unenforceable).

      • Jason@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 hours ago

        If these streamers aren’t being contracted, then it is basically the same as a gift. Selling the key is still perhaps morally dubious if there was an expectation of promotion, but that’s as far as it goes.

          • Jason@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            30 minutes ago

            My justification for what exactly? I wasn’t justifying anything.

            And what do you believe should be a crime? Giving out free keys, or selling keys that you got for free?

            If theres no formal agreement and no contract between the dev and the recipient of the key, where/what is the crime??