In an online discussion post, Alcorn State University history professor Dr. Jason Gibson posed a question that represented part of his students’ midterm. It was about the…

    • Trex202@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Yes, but school is there to teach you to use brain. Why go school if no use brain?

        • tburkhol@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          Goodhart’s law: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.

          Used to be that a college degree indicated people with time, money, and drive to put four years into study. It was a good measure of the “right” kind of person. Now it’s just another job requirement and doesn’t indicate anything.

          • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            It was a good measure of the “right” kind of person.

            Long ago, a college education used to assure that you were white, male, Protestant, at least upper middle class, and at least semi-literate (assuming you managed to at least get Gentleman’s C’s, so the required “drive” was minimal if you were from the right family). Admission was much more of a sure thing for the offspring of alumni.

            And that was what was necessary to join a business at that time: respectability and clubbability.

            A minimum admission requirement regarding academic performance was made more prominent as other acceptance criteria were broadened, but most private universities will still give an easy ride to legacies and to the offspring of large donors.

            Now it’s just another job requirement and doesn’t indicate anything.

            Well, you’re generally expected not only to have a degree, but one in a relevant field of study, and to have gotten good grades. And most of the big-name high-tech firms won’t generally accept a degree from any but a few globally prominent universities. They go by brand as much as by objective criteria of performance. That’s the new clubbability filter. Someone who cut-and-pasted AI slop at Stanford has a much better shot at a job than someone who did real work at Podunk State.

      • Malyca@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        18 days ago

        Why pay astronomical tuition, room and board, textbooks, all of it, just to learn nothing and use chat got. The bottom of the article said a professor at Brown thought all but 2 of his students cheated. At Brown. We’re so fucked.

        • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          18 days ago

          These selective colleges aren’t about education, they’re about getting you into a club with the other assholes that likely cheated their way through business school and got jobs the same way.

          Same with private high schools in the us. They aren’t teaching kids to read, math or think, they’re teaching them that being born rich means you get to be in charge of the plebs (which includes the professors and instructors at these institutions).