cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/74401190

Several countries are already ahead of Brussels. In 2025, a Paris court ordered five major VPNs to block more than 200 illegal sports streaming sites, while Italy moved to extend its Piracy Shield system to VPN and DNS providers.

In Spain, a Córdoba court ordered NordVPN and Proton VPN to block IP addresses tied to illegal LaLiga streams in February.

The same court later refused to fine NordVPN for not complying. LaLiga has since asked the Commission to add NordVPN, Proton VPN, ExpressVPN, and Surfshark to its piracy watch list.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Problem is, VPNs can enforce DNS - by blocking any secure (DoH/DoT) methods, forcing the device to fall back to regular insecure DNS, which has to go through the VPN tunnel, where the traffic can be intercepted and forced through their own DNS service.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          they can’t block all DoH and DoT service. the former literally looks like web traffic, the latter is even more generic. Basically anyone can spin up services like those

          • fonix232@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            If you can run an instance…

            DoT/DoQ is easy to block since it uses a specific port - 853.

            DoH, just block traffic to known providers by IP or SNI. There you go, secure DNS defeated.