Get your shortnames while the getting’s good.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    hahaha, this is the first thing I though after the idiot changed the iconic name to nothing, go twitter! (no, I’m not joining bluebird, but I like the trust threshold idea)

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    And I’m going to keep dead naming X as Twitter until Musk stops dead naming his daughter. I never used the site in the first place, but that’s besides the point.

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      And I’m going to keep dead naming X as Twitter until Musk stops dead naming his daughter.

      I’ll dead name Twitter long after Musk stops dead naming his daughter, or he himself is dead. X is a stupid fucking name.

    • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I joined when it was the only way to win a pair of tickets to The Colbert show’s last taping. I didn’t win, I’ve never opened the site again. My username is like “adifficultpoo” lol

    • Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      imo musk is a deadname now after he came out as a nazi. Now its just the nazi or space nazi if there are multiple nazi’s in the subject being discussed

  • kraxla@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Early Access is open. $20 to join, $40+ to fight.” From twitter.now

    xD. The original twitter was free!

  • Axolotl@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Yeah i’il keep using mastodon and bluesky, also, they already have investors so it’s dead at birth for me

    • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      also, they already have investors so it’s dead at birth for me

      Launching with the immediate intent for profit screams either a scam (Especially with Musk being kind to give up the name, massive red flag).

      • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Smells like deception. Please come to our “New” site with the same name but this one is totally not uncool or handing all your personal info to Musk.

        • PhoenixDog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          But spend more money? $8 on that piece of shit “X” site. Fucking joke show.

          But you can pay $20 for the premium instantaneous social media aggregate algorithm site! You’ll get all the top paid for profit sponsored posts first before anyone else! Just imagine retweeting your friends minutes before they see this million dollar donated Pepsi ad that is collaborating with Oreo! Whooooaaaaaa! You’ll be the most popular person in your friend group for 15 seconds! But make sure you share first or else you’ll be ostracized by everyone because you didn’t pay an extra $9.99 for ultra fast retweet privilege!

    • 7101334@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Bluesky is also owned by a corporation and, like Twitter, could sell to a fascist billionaire whenever they find it profitable to do so.

      X vs Bluesky is a great microcosm of American team-sports politics. Mastodon is something actually new.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yeah that’s true but perfect is the enemy of good, Mastodon isn’t gaining much traction so my hope is that at least we can get a federated protocol, whatever it is

        • Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Mastodon has a cultural problem… too woke, too many queers and freaky people, autistics, and activitists shilling for lame causes or selling (needless, silly) things. In the real world these people are 3-5% of the population. On the Fediverse, they are 75-90% of the population. Not a place that the other 95-98% of the population really wants to be. The mentally ill, each one given a bullhorn.

        • 7101334@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Perfect is the enemy of good, but so is the desire for convenience.

          Mastodon gains less traction because it doesn’t have an advertising budget, unlike Bluesky. Because Bluesky is owned by a corporation.

          Is Bluesky federated? I thought it wasn’t. Tumblr also said they were going to, but then just… didn’t.

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Yeah it does, though it uses their own protocol (ATprotocol) they open sourced it too

            • axx@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              12 hours ago

              The AT Protocol was open from the start. It’s not the issue and is actually rather clever in parts, in my limited understanding.

              The issue has more been that there was no way to run another server than the main one at first, and then that you could but it couldn’t interoperate. I understand this is now something of the past, but I don’t think I’ve ever come across a link to a bluesky post that wasn’t on bsky.app.

              Looking a bit into it, it looks like all you need to do is host a Personal Data Server (PDS): https://github.com/bluesky-social/pds?tab=readme-ov-file#self-hosting-a-pds

              • Axolotl@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                12 hours ago

                then that you could but it couldn’t interoperate

                So now you can? I hope so…
                Anyway yeah, i never seen someone self host their own instance even though it should be possible

  • Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ohhh Noos! The branding I choose which no one wanted or ever adopted is tarnished by my own actions from the last two years… Let’s rebrand and hopefully the user base will no longer associate my actions with this service anymore!

    • 🔍🦘🛎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Read the article next time. Another company claims X abandoned the name and is launching a competetor using “Twitter” “Tweets” and Twitter.now url.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Yeah. “Lets try centralized algorithmic corporate social media again.”

    Im sure this attempt will end up just as wholesome.

    • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I’m not claiming Twitter is great.

      But this is obviously going to fail, always was obviously going to fail. It’s a PR stunt, nothing more.

      Twitter will sue them, they’ll settle for giving up the name and some token fine, and hopefully they’re on the map. Or, their hail mary long shot will pay off and they’ll get to call themselves twitter in which case holy shit they’re golden. That’s the strategy.

      It’s stupid- they’ll lose in court and I doubt whatever they offer is more compelling than what’s already out there.

      • 5318008@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s stupid

        Definitely.

        they’ll lose in court

        I’m not sure they will, genuinely. They intentionally abandoned the domain name for the website… and they’re no longer using the logo or name anywhere on their product, or corporate documentation.

        The case that it’s up for grabs is actually decently strong.