• gian @lemmy.grys.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      You said that the third part shared my data with you after you sold them to them, this means that you have my data.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        Access to data isn’t the same as having data. You can watch a YouTube video but that doesn’t mean you downloaded it and have it.

        • gian @lemmy.grys.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 days ago

          True, but then the data about me you have are useless if you only look at them.

          There is no way that you get my data, you sold them to a third part (and here you are already at fault), this third part then share back the data with you for free and then you do nothing with my data, which you asked to begin with. Seriously ?

          And I forgot, the third part is at fault too because they have my data without any reasonsand if they get caught they pay a hefty fine.

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 days ago

            True, but then the data about me you have are useless if you only look at them.

            Marketing data is always kept close by the owners but they sell access or the data would be worthless.

            If the original company wants information about you, they don’t download everything from a marketing company. Like using Google, you type in your search and get a result. That search result is used and forgotten. You don’t have to download all of Google to use the results.

            The 3rd party wouldn’t be fined because if you knew who they were, you could send them a Gdpr and they would respond. The problem is knowing who these companies are.