• sys110x@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It’s really difficult to cool things in space, and it’s really difficult to power stationary things in space. It’s also really expensive to put things in space so size/weight is a problem.

    So if it’s not cheaper/better for cooling, and it’s not cheaper/better for power, and it’s not cheaper/better for rack space… why is there a focus on shipping compute to space?

    The point I keep coming back to is that it’s really hard for the public to protest/damage/destroy data centres in space.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Even if they could pull it off, the data transmission speed would be sooooo bad relative to what it would take to ingest insane amount of data and then regurgitate it back.

    • terranoid@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It’s extremely difficult from a cooling perspective IIRC, way more than on earth. Like you have to vent into a near vacuum, which is one of the best insulators.

    • CameronDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I think its simpler than that, its just stock price pumping. They can tell the plebs that they have the tech to put servers in space, and the plebs will eat it up and pump the stock.

      You can still destroy the terrestrial base stations.