GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agoA community turned to a griftlemmy.worldimagemessage-square42linkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up10arrow-down1imageA community turned to a griftlemmy.worldGolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 4 days agomessage-square42linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareBlaestEgnen@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·4 days agoCouldn’t this easily be solved by one university building a platform? I understand there’s a need to verify people actually are who they are and have credibility on the topic they review. So starting out utilising uni logins or something alike, and you’ll have all university professors included
minus-squareLux18@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoWhy would you restrict who’s allowed to read the publications based on the “credibility” of the reader? That’s not the problem, the problem is that the journals legally restrict you from making your publication openly accessible.
minus-squareBlaestEgnen@feddit.dklinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoNot read, but if you peer review something outside of your field. Experts should be able to see you’re off field and not assign the same level of credibility to that peer review
Couldn’t this easily be solved by one university building a platform?
I understand there’s a need to verify people actually are who they are and have credibility on the topic they review.
So starting out utilising uni logins or something alike, and you’ll have all university professors included
Why would you restrict who’s allowed to read the publications based on the “credibility” of the reader?
That’s not the problem, the problem is that the journals legally restrict you from making your publication openly accessible.
Not read, but if you peer review something outside of your field. Experts should be able to see you’re off field and not assign the same level of credibility to that peer review