The pioneering computer scientist on why Trump is using ‘superintelligence’ wrong, whether AI could wipe out humanity – and how our biggest challenge will be accepting we’re not the only intelligent beings
I am not. I want to understand what is the difference between “feeling” as result of electrochemical reactions in our brain and “feeling” as result of math performed on a numerical matrix. I am perfectly aware those are not the same, but the result may be similar, and what we care of the result determines the conclusions we can make.
You need to clearly explain what is thinking and what in the “thinking” process of LLM is not thinking. If you define “thinking” as electromechanical reactions in human brains then LLM is not thinking, but it is not a useful definition.
I’m already dropping it because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here even mediocre evidence hasn’t been provided to back up ridiculous claims anthropomorphizing “AI” so we are free to dismiss them outright.
Furthermore, you’re now trying to claim there are no such claims, which is obviously ridiculous, so feel free to fuck off and troll somebody else because I am done entertaining your bullshit.
I am not. I want to understand what is the difference between “feeling” as result of electrochemical reactions in our brain and “feeling” as result of math performed on a numerical matrix. I am perfectly aware those are not the same, but the result may be similar, and what we care of the result determines the conclusions we can make.
You need to clearly explain what is thinking and what in the “thinking” process of LLM is not thinking. If you define “thinking” as electromechanical reactions in human brains then LLM is not thinking, but it is not a useful definition.
I don’t need to explain shit, you’re the one making the claims. The burden of proof is on you.
Do you even know what a claim is?
This is a claim. You made a claim. My assertion that you need to substantiate your claim definitionally does not constitute a claim.
Bullahit;: YOU made the claim without evidence, I dismissed your baseless claim.
Not even close to being the same.
Please quote the claim I made you disputed, I will try to defend it or drop it.
I’m already dropping it because extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Here even mediocre evidence hasn’t been provided to back up ridiculous claims anthropomorphizing “AI” so we are free to dismiss them outright.
Furthermore, you’re now trying to claim there are no such claims, which is obviously ridiculous, so feel free to fuck off and troll somebody else because I am done entertaining your bullshit.