FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comexternal-linkmessage-square142linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkWhy Normal People Aren’t Using AI Agentswww.wired.comFoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square142linkfedilink
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day ago half the time Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoHmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
minus-squareParlimentOfDoom@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 day agoNo. Because they fuck up so often. Why would I keep using a broken tool?
minus-squareFranconian_Nomad@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·23 hours agoGotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.
Who said all the time? The problem is most people can’t tell which half it’s fucking up. An unreliable tool isn’t useful
Hmm. They fuck up 50 percent of the time? I not only doubt that, I know that this is wrong. No offense. Do you actively use LMMs?
No. Because they fuck up so often.
Why would I keep using a broken tool?
Gotcha. You‘re one of those guys talking out of their arse.