themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前Italian television channel does DLSS 5 haters a favor by broadcasting footage from reveal trailer, then copyright striking Nvidia's own YouTube channelwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square33linkfedilinkarrow-up1392arrow-down16cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1386arrow-down1external-linkItalian television channel does DLSS 5 haters a favor by broadcasting footage from reveal trailer, then copyright striking Nvidia's own YouTube channelwww.pcgamer.comthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 个月前message-square33linkfedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareMagicShel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up39arrow-down1·1 个月前That is, unfortunately incorrect. They write it up and their pet legislators introduce it. Yes it has to get voted on and there is more to it, but the actual verbiage? That is all too often written by lobbyists.
minus-squareozamataz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14·1 个月前https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/asbestos-sharia-law-model-bills-lobbyists-special-interests-influence-state-laws/ https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/11/11/243973620/when-lobbyists-literally-write-the-bill
minus-square3abas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 个月前They’re just refusing to be wrong, they’re doubling down on a technicality, not on who actually authors the legislation text.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down5·1 个月前Your own links are contradicting you.
That is, unfortunately incorrect. They write it up and their pet legislators introduce it. Yes it has to get voted on and there is more to it, but the actual verbiage? That is all too often written by lobbyists.
It’s not incorrect.
https://www.usatoday.com/pages/interactives/asbestos-sharia-law-model-bills-lobbyists-special-interests-influence-state-laws/
https://www.npr.org/sections/itsallpolitics/2013/11/11/243973620/when-lobbyists-literally-write-the-bill
They’re just refusing to be wrong, they’re doubling down on a technicality, not on who actually authors the legislation text.
Your own links are contradicting you.