• brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    38 minutes ago

    I hope the glasses break on their face. But:

    The two customers were, in fact, recording Hinkle, and the entire exchange was turned into content for social media.

    …Can people not see this is the root problem?

    These asswipes make a living being asswipes because Google, Meta, or Tiktok pay them to. Thats the root incentive. Most wouldnt risk all that trouble unless it was their living.


    In other words, I dont want the moral of the story to be “this wouldnt happen without Meta glasses.” The platform subsidizing those glasses is the ultimate problem.

  • mangobanana@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 hour ago

    There is only ONE good thing the meta glasses are for and it’s blind people. They are immensely useful to help the blind and low vision users to navigate the world. Other than that, they should not able to exist.

    • chunes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      As usual the disabled are the first to get hurt by all the bullshit people do. Guarantee one of these lemmy badasses who wants to run around hitting people is going to hit a blind person for just trying to get around.

  • deathbird@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What if we punished crimes instead of monetizing them? We’ve had a multimedia Internet for a generation now, we could do this.

  • HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    My new go to is to stop the conversation, tell them to tell their glasses, out loud, to stop recording. If they dont then that conversation is over.
    Period.

  • BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I was chatting with it CEO the other day and the your of recording glasses came up. He said they are band in the company, and they’ve had conversations with their lawyers, that also say not to allow them. I was happy to hear that.

  • Zarobi@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    This was a very good, detailed read, including interviews with real affected people. I recommend anyone skimming the headline to read the full article.

    • Komatoes@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      20 minutes ago

      Thanks, it was. And sad that in instances where the wearer could have been help accountable: Sprouts manager and comedy viewer, nothing was done.

  • TIEPilot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    In my line of work you would be terminated on the spot if you wore these to work. I have sections of the facility that a fit bit would get you escorted off site and likely loose your job.

    • imadethis@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Lucky you. I literally get a camera pointed at my face for every hour I work, and it screams if it thinks I’ve lost focus. Hopefully our bosses would tell these cameras to get bent, but based on their little rich people concerns over how to pacify the ‘lessers,’ I’m not hopeful.

  • Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    13 hours ago

    There are legitimate uses for head mounted cameras that track your focus.

    There are none for these devices that try to obfuscate their presence.

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Businesses need to start banning smart glasses with cameras or at least require the cameras to be covered with tape.

    • benjirenji@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Many places already do this with cellphones. It shouldn’t be different for such glasses. Using recording equipment is rarely appropriate in a workplace.

    • thejml@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I remember when you couldn’t have camera phones a lot of business. Seems like these would be prohibited simply from a security standpoint. Harassment would just be another reason on top of that.