• Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    So is he gonna redistribute his wealth? Cause ya know? Wealth hoarding is terrible and the people hoarding wealth (Sam Altman) should have to redistribute their wealth because that money could be better used to serve the people, right? In fact all billionaires and trillionaires should be engaging in wealth redistribution, right?

    If we’re gonna agree from a general consensus agreement POV why not make him give us his money because I mean if people owning computers is hurting the worldwide Ai industry, then clearly the wealth hoarding hurting the global economy can be solved simply by someone telling others to engage in redistribution, right?

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Division of labor implies those best at making money should do so for the group.

      Others will make food, clothing, shelter, and funny quips.

      • Hueristic_Autistic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        No, you missed what I was getting at entirely.

        If the global chip supply is going down that fast that he’s saying in so many words that everyone who’s owning a computer is owning an potential independent data center and that they should sacrifice and redistribute their ram for the good of the global corporate data centers.

        Now, if there’s a global economic indifference because the people like Altman, Zuckerberg, Bezos, Gates and Musk are hoarding the world’s wealth, shouldn’t they redistribute their wealth for the good of the global economy?

        I was also saying, that thinking that it’s gonna be as easy as just telling people to engage in either forms of redistribution is just asinine.