• IllNess@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 天前

    This is sickening. Restricting access should be done at the ISP level and should be opt-in for those with kids. A password can be set by the parent.

    We all really know this is about control.

  • pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 天前

    The headline is vert clickbaity : it does not affect VPN users (the law forbids age-gated websites from promoting VPNs as a circumvention), and the whole article is just an ad for VPNs

    • damnthefilibuster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      30 天前

      Didn’t read the article, as you said it’s just an ad for VPNs. But one way this affects VPN users is that now you can’t VPN into Italy to use a service without hitting the age verification prompt. That just sucks!

      • pcouy@lemmy.pierre-couy.fr
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 天前

        This would have been a (if not the only) good point to make in the article considering the title. But I guess this would have taken space away from ads

    • snipingsnipe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      29 天前

      Tbh I would generally welcome a VPN-industrial-complex as long as it doesn’t result in a small ring of big names lobbying for systematic monopolistic dominance as to crush anything that doesn’t require PII… but I’m sure commercial and state interests would converge :/