No worries. It’s always good to do that, even if it’s not perfect. It’s an ongoing process for all of us.

“Person” covers all bases, and I agree about rights for humans. Hard to say what their situation is without knowing more, though.

1. It’s absolutely not “intelligent”. You’re letting techbros con you into thinking text predictors are sentient. Don’t let them.

2. This story is explicitly about how the robot wasn’t autonomous, and was clearly being operated remotely by a human.

I don’t think the suggested slang has anything to do with that, but that is an important side of this drastic shift in the media landscape that isn’t discussed enough. Most everyone seems focused on these algorithms being used to make things up, not enough are talking about the misuse of claiming something factual is “AI” to discredit criticism or evidence. It’s already a problem and it’s going to get worse.

If only they had it explicitly laid out who is allowed to comment.

…oh wait, they do. So your “transphobia” strawman is entirely baseless.

You tell me. You’re the one that popped in here.

You: I’m going to kill so many fucking puppies

I already said that there’s an actual good version of post-scarcity, good try though. And letting wolves in sheep’s fur lead you into the slaughterhouse because they put up a sign that says “Utopia” is just going to doom you and everyone else.

“The image about what the billionaire psycho is saying isn’t really about what the billionaire psycho is saying.”

That’s not how this works.

My point is that what he’s aiming for isn’t what you’re imagining or describing. He doesn’t want comfort or care for others, he wants to have as much money and power as he can possible claw in, and others having something means he has less to hoard.

In short, he’s lying and it’s important to understand that.

It absolutely is a bad thing. There’s a version of “post scarcity” where everyone is provided for and cared for, and there’s the one these assholes are aiming for, where most are left to languish. His is unquestionably the latter.

“Damn Talent-Hoarders, hiding all that art behind a paywall if we need it for our startups. Now who’s laughing?!?!” - Totally mentally healthy techbros

From what I can make out, that and the recommended argument (–break-match-filters) rely on a filters list, which doesn’t seem to have a date option of their own. For now I’ve just added the problematic videos to my archive file, so they won’t slow it down anymore, but it feels like it should be possible to halt the script like that. Maybe it’s too niche of an edge case.

Add a custom default search engine on your browser of choice with the url https://www.google.com/search?q=PLACEHOLDER&udm=14, replacing PLACEHOLDER with whatever your browser needs it to be. Subject to stop working whenever google chooses, so keep that in mind.

Well obviously.

You may be surprised how not obvious this is to some people, hah. But your suggestions are interesting. I feel like Valve is just constantly adding surprising features with the on-board tech. Would be cool if that stuff got added.

Screen off ≠ off. The deck will always have to be on and out of sleep mode to do anything like that.

“He is The One. He movesthinks like they do.”

Shitty? Yes. “Enshitification”? No.

Inb4 it’s just flame wars all the way down (with a side of harassment).

You’re throwing out a lot of unconfirmable factors as if that “proves” it’s generated when they could equally prove it’s real. You say it “can’t exist” as is without providing any actual evidence supporting that claim. All your comment does is demonstrate that we don’t know enough from one photo alone.

You can’t just compare the raw heights and say they’re the same without factoring in anything else.

That is literally what the user I responded to did.

So when you eliminate the distance exacerbated by the height, the difference is negligible. Interesting. Wonder what that looks like in the OP photo: https://files.catbox.moe/g9vyzb.png