The biggest “no shit” comment was @[email protected]’s brave “As a man, I’ll get flak for this, but Uber’s PR piece is good and woke” one. Meanwhile, the reason Uber has these problems remains unaddressed.
But I guess Uber is the Woke Women Loving Hero of the Day, huh.
(You didn’t happen to enjoy the No Shit Rainbow Company Good comment, and get soured by people pointing out this’ll actually hurt minorities, did you?)
Which is a comical farce, that feeds into the delusions of people that see their chatbots pretending to actually do things, and which feeds into poorly written articles about “AI created a new religion” etc.
It’s all marketing BS.
If you’re worried about capitalism, things don’t look great here either: the top post in my feed right now is a corporate PR release.
(It’s this post.)
From a website where bots talk to each other quite a bit already.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
this smells like a setup for some legal strategy against trans-folks
Funny thing is, you’re absolutely right. Even if Uber doesn’t mean to lay the groundwork for a future culture war, they would love more infighting while they can shirk responsibility towards their workers.
I used a tone indicator to denote sarcasm, especially about the part I put in bold. You should read my comment as, there is more than one problem with Uber.
Is that a controversial take on Lemmy?
deleted by creator
What a relief. I’m glad they addressed the only problem with Uber /s
If anything, this is proof you should be next in line for a large venture capital infusion!
Maybe they should try suing the businesses that actually have tons of venture capital money to take.
god knows where?
This looks incredible and I wish I could get more information about how it was made, and whether we have our own.
The writing is less thrilling.
The premise is deliberately careful: not to pronounce guilt, but to surface cases … This is not a finished watchdog machine; it is infrastructure under construction… Its public roadmap points not only to Portuguese procurement data but to a broader European layer.
OP’s article is true. Did you accidentally click an Eli Yudkowsky article in your bookmarks?
The only difference between OpenAI and Anthropic is the amount donated to the Trump campaign. That’s it. Ethically they are identical. Their “red lines” are both actually green lights.
LLMs don’t create objectivity, so if you’re looking for “facts,” you’ll have to actually engage your brain.
This is technically job loss caused by AI…
AI aside, what a terrible name. They just stole Claude Cowork’s name, and called theirs Copilot Cowork.
Seriously? That’s the best they can do?
That explains why they aren’t getting sued, but the name still sucks. And speaking of OpenAI…
I thought Microsoft basically had OpenAI under their thumb. Why subpar? (Apparently things changed late last year.)