

Yeah, that’s where I ended up and didn’t know what to do with them. I guess I trust them as much as any unknown internet source


Yeah, that’s where I ended up and didn’t know what to do with them. I guess I trust them as much as any unknown internet source


Yeah I tracked it back to that, but couldn’t find the graph shown and had no knowledge of the ember.
Having said that, I’m all for the green revolution and would love to see it go harder. As a petrol head the idea of guilt free fuel is like a holy grail


Cool if true, but the source seemed to be bluesky soooo it’s a big gain of salt


Yeah, you gotta vote it up, they’re wrong for all the right reasons


People interested in cars have been scratching our heads with Tesla for years. Like at one point it was worth more than every other car market combined and its value kept going up. I mean there seems like years of irrational prices to the point it would be silly to bet against it


Did you come as well?
Disney would smoke Musk


They also don’t deserve to be scammed, but once again asking the companies to police their own content is “impossible.” Musk still needs the cash for a new political party when his current toy breaks


Looks like they think this will work better than telling social media companies that they have a social responsibility
Can we just imagine if al Qaeda had added a journalist to their group chat regarding a bombing?


It’s not just that. It’s that politicians get to pick the voters through voter purges,gerrymandering, I’d requirements etc.
Why is it “very very stupid”?
If you allow it for people you don’t like, where the bar for others.


Nah, he’s under Thiel


When you stop to think, they really don’t offer us anything other than a named place we all agreed to meet


Very fair, the persecution of Jack Ma was very interesting. Haven’t heard of what happened in Vietnam though?
You shouldn’t need to be authoritarian to crack down on these systems though. I really liked what I saw Lena Khan doing in the US, what Brazil did to twitter or what Julie Inman Grant did here in Australia


Sorry if you replied to this already, but I wanted to add that what I meant to say is that they hide behind the accountability we give them


I get what you’re trying to say, they can incentivise accuracy and they do at least prompt people to be more accurate lest the community holds them to account. But what i don’t like is that there is no standard that the notes are held to and there is no accountability if either the original post or the community note are wrong.
I also don’t like that the social media publishers are pushing the fact checkers onto the community to be done for free, but at the end of the day they own the community note and can delete it if they don’t like it. We are doing their work for them and taking accountability away from them


Lawsuits. As it stands the US supreme court is that social media companies can not be held liable for the things their users publish. Fact checking companies can be sued, news companies can be sued (see fox news and the voting machines lawsuit), Facebook can’t be held responsible in the same way
It’s been done in mining for decades